题目： Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

1. It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. 2. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
如今动物实验已经广泛运用在新药研制和安全性检测之中，一些人认为这种实验应该被取缔，因为违反道德，会使得动物遭受苦难，然而支持这种观点的人认为这对人类来来说是有益的。请讨论这两种看法并给出你的观点。
3.On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. 4. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. 5. Opponents of such[Such的使用起到前后衔接的作用，CC+] research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. 6. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
在药品及其他产品被正式用于人体之前都会例行公事在动物身上做实验，这是一件被认为普遍真理的事情。然而我却认为动物实验在道德上市错误的，但我仍支持为了医疗发展进行一部分的动物实验。
7.On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. 8. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. 9. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. 10. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
另一方面，动物实验中使用到的那些可靠选择不一定在所有情况下都适用，支持动物实验的人认为就小鼠和白鼠遭受到的这些痛苦而言，只要有助于挽救人类生命那就被证明是合理存在的。他们认为反对动物实验的人在亲人需要通过动物实验研制出来的药物来治病这一观点上比较冷漠。我个人是同意禁止在非医学产品上使用动物实验的，但我也认为当医学发现与新型毒品挂钩的时候会产生不可避免的灾祸

11. In conclusion, it seems to me that it would[Would的使用非常棒，LR+] be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
总的来说，在我看来在同等有效的planB被发现之前，禁止一切动物医学实验是错误的。